Our ethical management approach ensures lower fees… resulting in more performance staying in your pocket.
Can you hold the same investments but with lower costs?
Can you hold the same investments, but with lower costs?
- The answer to this question in many situations is yes….
- Lower Charges = More of the investment return staying in your pocket
Most of the managed / mutual funds that are available have multiple ‘share’ classes of the same fund, designed for the specific end clients (general retail client via an adviser, investment banks, other fund management groups, charities). All Managed Funds are subject to a management charge which is generally deducted from the funds unit price and in turn, comes from the gross performance of the underlying fund. The difference in the annual management fee charged by the Fund Manager for the various share classes can be significant and in some cases, well over a 1%pa difference.
In general, a normal retail investor would be invested in a retail or standard share class of the fund which in most cases would be the most expensive. From the annual management fee, the Fund Manager would then pay an amount to maybe a platform provider and/or to a financial adviser as a Trail Commission.
As different funds have a different % rate of incentive / trail commission being paid out, our personal view is that could potentially result in advisers only recommending or allocating to funds where they receive a higher commissions and as such, maybe the client is not being provided the best advice and being allocated towards the better funds performing funds.
However, most regulated Fund Managers now offer commission free share classes (commonly known as Clean Class). As the Fund Manager is not paying commission incentives to advisers, banks, platforms etc from this version of the funds, this results in a lower fund Management Charge. As less charges are being deducted, this results in greater net return….. resulting in more of the return being retained by the investor.
I have provided examples of 3 different funds and how investors can benefit from the lower charging versions of the funds. Please note at Ethical Offshore Investments, we will always allocate to the lowest charging version of the fund that is available on that particular platform.
The Fundsmith Equity Fund is one of the largest equity funds (currently sitting at £ 28.3 billion) and has also been one of the most successful over the past 10 years.
The normal retail version of this fund is the ‘T Class” version which has an Annual Management Fee (AMC) of 1.55%pa. This is the % of the fund value that is deducted from the unit price on an annual basis to cover the management costs (trading, legal, salaries, general day to day office costs) as well as an amount that can be paid as a commission incentive to certain advisers, platforms and other financial institutions.
Clients of Ethical Offshore can access the ‘I Class’ version of this fund which has an AMC of only 0.95%pa (compared to 1.55%pa for T Class). It is the exact same fund, so the exact same investment strategy for both I class & T class but with different management fees being charged internally by Fundsmith.
- A. Fundsmith Equity I Class – (10 year performance 509.7%)
- B. Fundsmith Equity T Class – (10 year performance 474.1%)
So an investment of £ 10,000 into each version of the fund over the same time period, experiencing the same gross investment returns and volatility, but by investing in the I Class version of the fund, our investors would have generated an extra £ 3,560 of value (an additional 0.70%pa of compounded return).
Another example of this benefit is with the Guinness AM Global Equity Income Fund, which is a popular fund held in many offshore portfolios.
The below example is comparing the C class version of the fund (which seems to be the version more widely held for offshore portfolios) and the Y class version which can also be accessed through Ethical Offshore.
Clients of Ethical Offshore can access the Y Class version of this fund with an AMC of 0.81%pa (the C Class has an AMC of 1.81%pa).
- A. Guinness AM Global Equity Income Y Class – (10 year performance 240.0%)
- B. Guinness AM Global Equity Income C Class – (10 year performance 210.2%)
So once again, an investment of £ 10,000 into each of the versions of the fund, over the same 10 year period, experiencing the same gross investment returns and volatility, but by investing in the Y class, our investors would have an extra £ 2,980 of value (an additional 1.01%pa of compounded return)
Finally our last example, is comparing the Marlborough European Multi-Cap fund. Marlborough are a very highly rated Fund Management group and their funds are regularly found in offshore portfolios.
The below example is the performance of the P class (AMC of 0.82%pa and is the version of the fund that use for clients of Ethical Offshore) and the A Class which has an AMC of 1.57%pa. Marlborough also have offshore versions (domicile in Guernsey) of the same fund strategy which has an even higher AMC of 1.92%pa (A Class) and 2.92%pa (F Class). For the purpose of this comparison, we will compare the UK listed P and A class versions.
- A. Marlborough European Multi-Cap P Class (10 year performance 429.9%)
- B. Marlborough European Multi-Cap A Class (10 year performance 401.1%)
Once again, the same £ 10,000 amount invested into each of the 2 versions of the fund, over the same period, investors in the I class would have generated an additional £ 2,890 of value (an additional 0.6%pa of compounded return).
Investing £ 10,000 into each of the above funds over the past 10 years, if using the lower charging versions of each fund, this would have resulted in an additional combined £ 9,430 of net growth achieved….. so an additional 0.8%pa
WHY ARE WE DIFFERENT?
We are not driven towards ‘commission paying’ funds and as our revenue is generated from the charging of a transparent client management fee, this ensures that we are providing guidance on Fund Managers and investment strategies for our individual clients, based on the actual needs of the individual clients. We are therefore not influenced by financial incentive from fund groups and as such, we can provide our guidance based solely on fund manager merit.
We have an incentive of generating superior returns as the greater return we generate for our clients, we also benefit. So if we can identify a way to reduce clients costs, it not only benefits the clients by them keeping more of the funds performance in their pockets…… it also benefits us.
And that is why we will always use the lowest charging structure version of the fund available with the various Life Companies and Direct Platforms.
If you would like to see if there are lower cost versions of the managed funds that you are holding (Same Investments but with Lower Costs), press Compare Fund Management Costs.
Example of the Fund Managers we use:
Guinness Asset Management
IShares by BlackRock
Franklin Templeton Investments